BREAST TENDERNESS
Why are my breasts
so tender?
Breast tenderness is a very common symptom. It is
rarely associated with breast cancer, but a thorough exam by an
experienced physician is important to be sure.
Most women experience at least some increase in
sensitivity or tenderness in their breasts as their menstrual
cycle approaches In some women this can become quite
severe. The tenderness may be diffuse, involving all
of the breast tissue, or it may be localized to one breast, or one
area of one breast. Though it usually lessens after the
menstrual period it may be constant. It is clear that
changing hormone levels in the blood stream are the primary
explanation, but there may be other contributing factors.
Certain medications may increase tenderness, including birth
control pills, estrogen or progesterone (Premarin, Provera, Ogen,
Climara, Estratest, and others), and medications which contain
xanthines (Theodur, caffeine containing stimulants). Caffeine
seems to cause increased breast tenderness for many women, though
it seems to have no effect in others. Marked breast
tenderness frequently occurs in the very early stage of pregnancy
also. Sometimes a cyst can develop and enlarge rapidly,
causing localized tenderness. Less commonly, an area of
infection may occur which can be extremely tender.
If you have recently noticed
that your breasts are more tender, you should be sure to do a good
self-exam of your breasts. See if can identify a specific
area that hurts, and feel for any lumps. Look for any visible
changes such as a visible lump, or a dimpling of the skin, or
redness. Schedule an appointment with your physician, and
take a list of your current medications. Be aware of how
much caffeine you are using, including coffee, tea, sodas,
chocolate, and any caffeine-containing medications, such as diet
pills or stimulants. Be able to pinpoint when your last
menstrual period was, and whether it was normal or not. Ask
your physician's office if you should have a mammogram or other
studies before your appointment, and if you should bring your
mammograms with you.
Return
to top of article
Will I need a biopsy?
For most women with breast tenderness, the
physician's exam will not identify any problem which needs a
biopsy. However, occasionally there is an associated lump,
which could be a fluid-filled cyst, an abscess, or a solid growth
of tissue. Such findings will likely require a procedure,
such as use of a needle, or other sort of biopsy or removal.
This may frequently be done at the time of the initial
visit. (Please note that some insurance companies do not
cover procedures to be done on the same day as your exam. If
not, you will be scheduled to return for the procedure after your
insurance company has given authorization .)
Cysts can be treated simply with drainage of the fluid
through a needle. The pain from the fluid drainage is
similar to what you would feel if you have a blood test
done. The cyst fluid usually has a greenish, yellowish, or
brownish tint. There is usually no need to "test"
the fluid if it has this typical appearance.
Abscesses usually require a small incision to drain the
infection. For small abscesses, treatment can and should be done
immediately. The infection causes more surrounding
tenderness than a cyst, so the drainage procedure is likely to be
more painful, but brief. The advantage of immediate
treatment may outweigh the extra tenderness. Larger
abscesses may require drainage in a hospital setting in order to
provide adequate sedation and /or anesthesia.
Solid growths of tissue may be biopsied with a needle at
the initial visit. Some anesthetic is injected around the
area to be biopsied. The needle is then inserted into the
lump to obtain a sample of tissue for analysis. An
ultrasound machine is frequently used to place the needle
precisely. Most women experience little or no discomfort with
the procedure.
Return
to top of article
What can I do to decrease
my breast tenderness?
Once your physician has examined for any possible
problems such as a cyst, abscess or possible cancer, there are
several things you can do. If you are taking in any caffeine
on a daily basis, try cutting out all caffeine products for a
period of six weeks. This simple step may be all that is
necessary. If your tenderness goes away, you may want to
experiment by starting back on caffeine to see if your tenderness
comes back. You may find that there is a certain amount of
caffeine which you can tolerate without the symptoms.
Both vitamin E and evening primrose oil have been found
to be helpful for many women. Though the exact mechanism of action
is not known, both supplements have been found to be beneficial in
decreasing tenderness. Recommended dosages for vitamin E
range from 400 U to 800 U per day. It is available at all
drug stores and many supermarkets without a prescription.
Recent studies have warned of possible increased risk of heart
disease with vitamin E at the higher doses, over time. So if
you want to try vitamin E for treating your breast tenderness, try
the 400 U dose to start with.
Evening primrose oil is carried by many drug stores,
though it may be more difficult to find than vitamin E. It is more
commonly recommended in England than here in the United States
. Recommended dosage is up to four tablets per day. It
can cause some gastrointestinal side effects, such as bloating or
gas, and changes in your bowel movements. These side effects
are less likely at lower dosages.
There are many simple measures to try that may
help. If your tenderness is predictable with each menstrual
cycle, you may want to begin taking on over-the-counter pain
medicine, such as Tylenol, Advil, Alleve, or other, for the week
before your period. A good hot bath once or twice a day can
help. Changing to a different bra is also occasionally
beneficial.
Depending on the severity of your tenderness, you may
want to use some or all of these measures. Most women will
obtain sufficient relief with the steps described above. For
the small group of women with persistent disabling tenderness
despite all these measures, there is a hormonal treatment which is
very effective, but which has a high likelihood of side
effects. It involves use of Danazol, a hormone used in
treatment of endometriosis. Side effects include changes in
menstrual cycle, voice changes, and body hair growth.
Return
to top of article
Fibrocystic Disease
Breast Pain. Painful breast tissue is an
exceedingly common symptom but is usually of functional origin and
very rarely a symptom of breast cancer. Of all women diagnosed
with breast cancer, breast pain is only present about 5% of the
time.
Although not a symptom of cancer, breast pain is a common reason
for patients to seek medical attention. Breast pain appears to be
aggravated by abnormal menstrual cycles and may be seen in young
women with menstrual irregularity, as a premenstrual symptom, or
when hormones are administered during and after
the menopause. In addition, fibrocystic change, in its severest
forms, may cause disabling breast pain. Although many observers
find painful cystic mastopathy is aggravated by excessive intake
of caffeine, nicotine, or commonly used antihistamines, other
investigators disagree.
Fibrocystic Change (Cystic Mastopathy, Cystic Mastitis).
Fibrocystic change, popularly referred to as fibrocystic disease,
represents a spectrum of clinical and histologic findings and
describes a loose association of cyst formation, breast nodularity,
stromal proliferation, and epithelial hyperplasia. Fibrocystic
change appears to represent an exaggerated response of breast
stroma and epithelium to a variety of circulating and locally
produced hormones and growth factors. Clinically, patients with
fibrocystic change have dense, firm breast tissue with palpable
lumps and frequently gross cysts. This condition is commonly
painful and tender to touch. Histologically, the lesion recognized
as fibrocystic complex contains macrocysts, microcysts, stromal
fibrosis, adenosis, and a variable amount of epithelial metaplasia
and hyperplasia. All these changes can occur alone or in
combination and to a variable degree in the normal female breast.
Autopsy studies have questioned whether any of these changes,
except perhaps macrocysts, are abnormal. In fact, all of these
lesions occur commonly in the breasts of elderly patients and
appear to have no particular pathologic potential. It appears
preferable to describe each of the lesions separately and comment
about the extent and severity of the process.
There is no consistent association between
fibrocystic complex and breast cancer. It is well established that
women who have undergone breast biopsy for any reason, regardless
of the underlying pathology, have a slightly higher risk of
developing subsequent breast cancer. Moreover, the incidence of
finding fibrocystic disease in autopsied breasts from women dying
of causes other than breast cancer exceeds the incidence of these
same changes in cancer-containing breasts. For those patients with
fibrocystic changes, higher risk appears to concentrate in those
whose biopsy specimens show abnormal ductal and lobular
hyperplasia and, to a lesser extent, cyst formation. Therefore,
the fibrocystic complex appears to be an exaggerated or abnormal
response to otherwise physiologic stimuli in most patients and
represents a health risk only in certain subsets.
Return
to top of article
BREAST LUMPS
I just found a lump in my breast, what
should I do?
Any lump in your breast should be checked by a
qualified physician to determine what it is. If you are not
sure whether it's really a "lump", or not, you may wish
to wait through a menstrual period to see if the new finding is
still present. But if it is a definite lump, you
should not delay.
A new lump may simply be a benign cyst, or it may
be the first sign of a breast cancer. In most cases,
additional studies will be done, such as a mammogram, or
ultrasound, and frequently some sort of biopsy is also
necessary. In some cases, where the new finding is not a
distinct lump, you may be asked to return for a re-exam in a few
weeks or months.
Return
to top of article
I have a lump, but my mammogram
is normal, so it's not cancer, right?
You must understand that not all cancer shows up on
mammography. Any lump needs to be examined by a
qualified physician, whether it shows up on mammography or
not. If the lump is not seen on mammography, it may still
need to be biopsied. An ultrasound may be helpful.
I had a routine mammogram and it
showed "calcifications", or a "nodule".
I have been referred to a surgeon. Does this mean I have
cancer?
Screening mammograms have become an important
method to screen for breast cancer. We have learned that
mammograms can often detect the earliest signs of breast cancer,
at a point in time when it can not yet be felt. Early breast
cancer often shows up as a small cluster of calcifications, which
look like a small grouping of tiny white flecks on the
mammogram, or as a small nodular area which is more white than the
surrounding breast tissue. But, these same
abnormalities can be caused by breast changes that are not
breast cancer as well. Only about one fourth of these
abnormalities end up being cancer when they are biopsied.
But the only way to be sure is to sample the tissue with some sort
of biopsy. This means that about three fourths of those who
have a biopsy will find out that there is no evidence of cancer.
Return
to top of article
BREAST CYSTS
My doctor says I just have a cyst in my
breast? What causes cysts? Should I have it
removed? Should it be drained with a needle? Will it
come back?
Breast cysts are very common. They are
frequently quite large, and often a bit tender. They may
seem to have popped up overnight, as a very large lump, the size
of a grape or larger. Although we don't know why they occur
specifically, it seems they develop as a response to the normal
hormone variations that occur through the monthly menstrual
cycle. Sometimes they will go away on their own as quickly
as they come, but often they remain for some time.
Cysts can be classified as "simple" or
"complex". An ultrasound is especially helpful in
evaluating cysts; in fact, if a lump has all the characteristics
of a simple cyst on ultrasound, it can be safely "left
alone". But when it can be clearly felt, and doesn't go
away, it may be best to drain it with a needle. This is
simple to do, and it can relieve any tenderness. What's
more, there is nothing more reassuring about a new lump in your
breast than to make it disappear!
Cysts can come back, but most do not. Some women
tend to develop new cysts over and over, and some women develop so
many cysts that it seems impossible to try to drain all of
them. This situation is challenging, because it makes it
hard to decide if there may be a "new" lump hiding in
the background of all the cysts. In such cases, it may be
best to plan to have your breasts checked by a physician more
frequently, perhaps every 3-6 months. Though this is no
guarantee of finding any breast cancer early, it should help.
Having lots of cysts does not appear to increase your chances of
having breast cancer; it just makes it harder to check.
Return
to top of article
I had a cyst drained, and the fluid
looked green. Should the fluid be tested for cancer?
In years past, doctors routinely sent cyst fluid
to be analyzed for cancer. But it turns out that the
information obtained is not really helpful in deciding what to do,
so most doctors have stopped doing this routinely. There may
still be situations in which cyst fluid analysis is helpful.
This may include cases in which the fluid is crystal clear,
bloody, in cases where the cyst looks unusual on ultrasound, or in
a patient who has an especially high risk of cancer.
Return
to top of article
My teenage daughter found a
lump in her breast. What should we do?
It is very rare for lumps in teenagers to be
cancer, but it should still be checked out by a physician. In
most cases, it is a benign growth called a fibroadenoma, which is
not cancer, and except for rare cases, will not turn into
cancer. If left alone, they usually will eventually go away
(regress), but this process may take years.
Fibroadenomas usually have very typical features on
ultrasound, and they have a very typical rubbery feel, and can be
"pushed around" in the breast tissue very easily, so
your physician may be quite certain that your lump is a
fibroadenoma even without a biopsy. But, a biopsy is very
simple to do, using a "fine needle" or a "core
biopsy", so if you or your doctor have any anxiety about it,
a biopsy or excision should definitely be done.
Sometimes it may make more sense to just remove the lump rather
than do a biopsy. A lump brings with it a certain
amount of anxiety even if a biopsy is "benign". If
you feel that leaving the lump in would cause you too much
anxiety, even if benign, then you and your doctor may want to skip
the biopsy and just remove it.
There is no one in my family who has had breast
cancer, so my chances of getting breast cancer are very low aren't
they?
Don't assume that you won't get breast cancer just
because it doesn't run in your family! Most breast cancers
are not inherited, meaning that any female is at
risk. If you have a lump in your breast, or if you have a
suspicious finding on your mammogram, it must be evaluated
carefully, regardless of whether cancer runs in your family.
Return
to top of article
I have some drainage from my
nipple. Is that normal?
There are different types of nipple discharge,
some of which are of little concern, and others which are
suspicious. Many women may see a little milky, or slightly
greenish discharge from the nipples at times. It might be
seen when the breast is massaged or the nipple is squeezed or
stimulated, and may be seen from more than one of the ducts on the
nipple. This type of discharge is considered
normal. If you notice this type of drainage from your
nipples when you squeeze them, it's probably best to just stop
squeezing them.
If the nipple drainage occurs spontaneously, without massaging
or squeezing the nipple, it frequently indicates a small growth
inside one of the breast ducts just under the nipple. Most
of these tiny growths are benign, and are called "papillomas", but
on occasion, the source of the drainage is a small cancer.
This sort of drainage should usually be managed by a type of
biopsy, called a "ductal excision", in which the breast tissue
just under the nipple is removed. The cosmetic result is
usually very good. In most cases, this procedure can be done
under local anesthesia in the outpatient setting.
Return
to top of article
My mother had breast
cancer. Does that mean I will get breast cancer?
If someone in your immediate family has been
diagnosed with breast cancer, then your risk of developing breast
cancer is increased by about a factor of 2, over the general
population of women. If there are
more than one with breast cancer in your family, your risk goes up
further, especially if the cancers occurred at a young age
(younger than 40).
Although most breast cancers are not primarily due to
genetic factors (related to family history), there is a group of
women who carry a gene that carries with it an extremely high risk
for developing both breast and ovarian cancer. These genes
are called the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. These gene mutations
can be identified by a blood test. Most women do not need to have this test
done. But it is usually recommended for women who have young family members with breast cancer, or if there is
also a family history of ovarian cancer. Each patient
considered for the test must be counseled about what the test
involves, and what are the implications of the test results.
If you want more information, please contact our office. The
genetic testing and counseling is available through the Kann
Cancer Center at DeKalb Medical Center.
Return
to top of article
Is there anything I can do to prevent
getting breast cancer?
We do know something about risk factors for breast
cancer. Breast cancer incidence is higher in patients who
are overweight, those who drink moderate to high amounts of
alcohol daily, and those who consume a diet high in saturated
fats. There is also a higher incidence in those who have
early onset of menstruation, those who have no full-term
pregnancies until late in life, or those who never have any
pregnancies. Also, for those with children, breast feeding
appears to decrease the incidence of breast cancer.
Most women will not want to base their family planning on
decreasing their cancer risk, but it's at least helpful to
understand these potential implications. But some basic
preventive life styles make sense for most everyone, namely,
avoiding saturated fats as much as possible, abstaining from
alcohol, and maintaining an ideal body weight. Other good
life style measures in general include complete abstinence form
tobacco products, a diet high in fiber, and a regular exercise
program.
Another option for women with higher than normal risk for
breast cancer have another option. A large national clinical
trial has demonstrated that taking tamoxifen for five years
can decrease the relative risk of developing breast cancer by
about 50%. Tamoxifen is a type of hormonal therapy very
commonly used in the treatment of breast cancer. When it is
given to women who do not have breast cancer (but have a higher
risk of getting it), it's use is called "chemoprevention".
You should understand a bit more about evaluating risk.
For the general population of women, only about 1% are going to
develop breast cancer over the next five years and 8-10% over
their lifetime. A woman whose risk is estimated to be high
would be in a group whose risk is double, or, about 2% over five
years, and over 20% lifetime. If this group of women all
take tamoxifen for five years, only about 1% ( 1/2 of 2%) will
develop breast cancer over five years, rather than the 2% that was
otherwise predicted. We don't yet know the long term
benefits after completion of five years of tamoxifen, but it is
expected that this benefit will continue. Note that,
although the breast cancer incidence is cut in half, there are
really only about 1% of the women taking the tamoxifen who
actually benefit.
Women who take tamoxifen often experience an increase in hot
flashes. Other potential side effects include an increase in
risk of developing phlebitis or blood clots in the leg veins, with
its associated complications, as well as an increased risk of
developing changes in the cells lining the uterus, sometimes
(though rarely) even to the point of cancer. In view of
this, annual Pap smears are particularly important.
If your breast cancer risk is higher than the general
population, and you want to consider tamoxifen, discuss these
issues in detail with your physician, so you feel comfortable with
your decision. The surgeons at DeKalb Surgical Associates
can assist you in this process.
Return
to top of article
How can I determine how high my risk of
breast cancer is?
We can give an estimate of a woman's risk of
developing breast cancer based on several factors such as family
history, prior breast biopsy results, age at onset of menstrual
periods, etc. One popular "model" for quantifying
this risk is called the Gail model. By "plugging
in" all the pertinent information, a calculation of the
5-year and lifetime risk can be made. For the "no
risk" women, her 5 year risk would be about 1%, meaning that
if there were 1000 women with no risk factors, in five years,
approximately 10 of them would have developed breast
cancer. A woman who has one or more risk factors, such as
family history, no pregnancies, etc, her 5 year risk may be 1.5%,
or 2.5% or higher. This would mean that in a group of 1000
women with all those same risk factors, 15 or 20 would develop
cancer over the next five years.
Lifetime risk for a woman with no risk factors would be
in the range of 10%, meaning that 100 of 1000 similar women would
develop breast cancer sometime during their lifetime. For
women with one or more risk factors, their lifetime risk may be
15% or perhaps as high as 50%.
If you would like to determine your risk of developing
breast cancer the Gail model is available online at http://bcra.nci.nih.gov/brc/.
We can also do this as part of your evaluation in our office.
If my risk of developing breast cancer
is high as calculated by the Gail model, is there anything I can
do about it?
In 1998, a landmark study was published regarding
the use of tamoxifen in the prevention of breast
cancer. About 13,000 women were enrolled in this
five year trial, comparing tamoxifen to a placebo (sugar
pill). The incidence of breast cancer development over about
five years was decreased by about 50%. In the placebo group,
about 20 out of 1000 women developed cancer, whereas only about 10
out of 1000 women developed cancer in the tamoxifen group.
These results are dramatic, in that this is the first ever drug study
to demonstrate the ability to prevent breast cancer from
developing in the first place. More info can be obtained
from the NCI web page at
http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/pressreleases/BCPTfollowup.
If a women chooses to take tamoxifen for prevention, it
must be taken for a total of five years. One must be aware
that there are some potential undesirable side effects.
There were a few more cases of endometrial cancer when taking
tamoxifen, and there were more women with blood clot
problems. And there may be side effects of hot flashes,
vaginal discharge, cataract formation, and depression. But
for some women the benefits may clearly outweigh the risks.
Return
to top of article
I have heard that Evista (raloxifene)
can also decrease my risk of getting breast cancer. Is this
true?
Raloxifene is a relatively new drug that has been approved for
the prevention of osteoporosis. In the study which was
conducted to look at its effect in osteoporosis, it was noted
incidentally that there were fewer women diagnosed with breast
cancer when taking raloxifene. This incidental finding needs
to be confirmed before we are certain of the benefit. There
is currently a study underway to evaluate this. It is called
the STAR trial, which has now been "closed". Over 13,000 women
have been enrolled, to
receive either tamoxifen, or raloxifene, for five years, to see if
raloxifene provides the same decrease in breast cancer incidence
as tamoxifen. Side effects of both crugs will also be
compared. The results of this important trial should be
available in the next year or so.
Return
to top of article
BREAST CANCER
I have had a breast biopsy and it showed cancer. What is the best treatment?
Once a breast cancer is diagnosed, there are a number of steps
taken to determine the treatment options. In most cases, a mastectomy is not
necessary. Your physician will review your medical history, and do a physical
exam, in order to predict whether the cancer is localized in the breast. The
size and nature of the tumor in the breast will be assessed after its removal,
and when appropriate, removal of one or more lymph nodes under the arm will be
done to look for evidence of cancer spread. This information will be used to
customize your treatment plan.
Treatment options for breast cancer include a variety of
modalities, including surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy and hormonal
therapy. The extent of your cancer will determine whether just some, or all, of
these modalities will be recommended. In general, the smaller and more
localized cancers can be treated with fewer of the modalities.
Women sometimes think that doing more is better, for example,
that doing a complete mastectomy is better than just a lumpectomy. However
there is very clear proof that women do not need to lose their breast in order
to be free of cancer.
Return
to top of article
What is DCIS
(ductal carcinoma in situ), or non-invasive cancer? What is the treatment for
it?
DCIS is the earliest form of breast cancer that can be
identified. The term is used to describe cells that have characteristics of
cancer that have not yet grown beyond the borders of the breast duct where they
started. Since the cancer cells have not yet “invaded” the surrounding tissue,
the risk that there are cancer cells elsewhere in the body is almost zero.
DCIS is the most commonly identified type of cancer
if a biopsy is done for calcifications seen on a mammogram. In most cases, it
can be successfully treated with a simple surgical removal of a portion of
breast tissue, followed by radiation therapy to that breast. Lymph node removal
is rarely necessary. Chemotherapy is not necessary. Recent studies have shown
that your risk for any new breast cancer can be reduced further if the DCIS in
your breast has receptors for hormones. In such cases, your physician may
recommend taking tamoxifen for five years. There is also a clinical trial that
is available, which compares taking tamoxifen to anastrozole for five years.
This new drug has already shown efficacy for invasive breast cancer, and is now
being tested for similar efficacy in DCIS. Your physician may discuss this
trial further with you.
Return
to top of article
Isn’t
it better to just have a mastectomy to be sure all the cancer is removed?
In most cases, mastectomy is not a better treatment for breast
cancer, compared with breast-conserving methods. Over 100 years ago, there was
no known effective treatment for breast cancer. A famous surgeon, William
Halsted, tried doing a very extensive procedure, known as a radical mastectomy,
for women presenting with advanced breast cancer. He showed that these women
did better than those with lesser treatment. Over the next 50 years, radical
mastectomy became the standard treatment for all women with breast cancer.
Since these early days, breast cancer is usually being diagnosed
at a much earlier stage. For Dr. Halsted, the typical woman with breast cancer
had a large cancer, with many involved (cancerous) lymph nodes already present
in the armpit. These days, most breast cancers are less than an inch in
diameter, and have not yet spread to the lymph nodes. Numerous publications
have proven that breast-conserving surgery combined with radiation therapy,
gives the same long-term results as mastectomy.
There are a few exceptions where mastectomy may still be
recommended. Some women with breast cancer actually have multiple cancers in
the breast at one time. Others may have a large cancer relative to the size of
their breast, such that breast-conserving surgery would not provide a
cosmetically acceptable result. Women who have a very high breast cancer risk
may wish to decrease their risk by having bilateral mastectomy. Your physician
can discuss these options further with you.
Return
to top of article
What does “sentinel lymph
node biopsy” mean?
Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a new way of evaluating the lymph
nodes under the arm for evidence of breast cancer spread. Ever since Dr.
Halsted began doing radical mastectomy for breast cancer, surgical treatment for
breast cancer has included removal of the lymph nodes under the arm. This is
usually the first place a breast cancer might spread, so it is considered an
important part of the therapy, to at least see if there is any cancer there. In
Dr. Halsted’s day, virtually all women diagnosed with breast cancer had cancer
already in the lymph nodes. For this reason, it was only logical that the lymph
nodes under the arm should be removed. But currently, only about 20-30% of
women have any cancer found in the lymph nodes, and it is usually limited to
just one or two.
If there is no cancer in the lymph nodes, there clearly is no
therapeutic benefit to removing them, and in fact, there can be some harm.
After lymph node removal, some women develop arm swelling, called lymphedema,
which can be either mild, and self-limited, or may at times become almost
disabling. And so, if we can determine that the lymph nodes are free of cancer
without removing a lot of them, we can avoid possible problems with lymphedema.
This is what sentinel lymph node biopsy allows us to do.
Recent research has shown that essentially all the lymphatic flow
from the breast filters first through just one or two lymph nodes under the arm,
and from there, onward to all the others. By isolating these first nodes, or
“sentinel nodes”, and removing only those nodes, we can find out if there is any
cancer spread to the nodes without removing all the others. Dye is injected
into the breast, and the (blue) dye is carried into these sentinel nodes. Then
through a small incision under the arm, the sentinel nodes can be easily spotted
and removed.
The surgeons at DeKalb Surgical Associates participated in the
national multicenter clinical trials that demonstrated the reliability of
sentinel node biopsy. Currently, sentinel node biopsy is the preferred method
for evaluating the lymph nodes, unless the lymph nodes are palpable.
If the removal of the sentinel node shows cancer, it is usually
recommended that a more complete removal of the lymph nodes be done. In cases
where the cancer in the lymph node is very small, or seen only with special
stains (called immunohistochemistry), there is probably no advantage to remove
any other nodes.
Return
to top of article
What is
chemotherapy?